Courts-Martial
Discharge Upgrades
Court Martial Appeals
Boards of Inquiry
Records Correction
About Us
At William E. Cassara, PC, we devote our firm's resources to representing current and former military members in military related matters. Mr. Cassara has nearly thirty years of experience in military law. If you or your loved one is facing a court-martial, Mr. Cassara is well versed in the Uniformed Code of Military Justice, and has been defending service members around the world his entire career. If a service member has been convicted at court-martial, Mr. Cassara has extensive experience in court-martial appeals, and has represented service members before all service courts of criminal appeals, the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, and the U.S. Supreme Court. Mr. Cassara's expertise has lead to the reversal of numerous court-martial convictions, as shown here in our representative cases.
In addition to representing service members at courts-martial and court-martial appeals, Mr. . Cassara also draws on his extensive experience to protect your rights in a variety of other military matters. These matters can include corrections of military records, discharge upgrades, security clearance revocations, MEBs and PEBs proceedings before Boards of Inquiry/Administrative Separation Boards and a variety of other military legal matters to include disenrollment from ROTC or service academies, adverse fitness report appeals, GOMOR and other reprimand appeals and other related matters..
Call Mr. Cassara at 800-511-9293 to discuss your case. You will not speak to a legal assistant, "chat box" or answering service. If he is not in, he will return your call, and you will speak directly with an experienced attorney.
In the
Media
Recent Accomplishments
Air Force Appellate Court Finds Conditions of Pretrial Confinement in Civilian Facility Unduly Harsh
The Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals recently released its decision in United States v. Cassaberry-Folks. Staff Sergeant Cassaberry Folks pled guilty to a number of offenses, including four specifications of assault consummated by a battery, extortion, forgery, and larceny. He was sentenced, in accordance with his plea agreement, to a bad conduct discharge, 18 … Read more
Army Appellate Court Sets Aside Assault Conviction Due to Failures by Prosecutors and Trial Judge
The Army Court of Criminal Appeals recently decided the case of United States v. Burch. Warrant Officer Burch was originally charged with four specifications of sexual assault. His counsel entered negotiations with the Government to resolve the case with a plea agreement. Throughout the negotiations, the defense counsel made clear that Warrant Officer Burch would … Read more
Highest Military Court Issues Important Decision on Sexual Assault Prosecutions
Last year, the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces [CAAF] agreed to consider the case of United States v. Mendoza. We discussed the case here. Mendoza was a sexual assault case involving a Soldier who woke up the morning after becoming extremely intoxicated and did not recall most of what had happened the night … Read more
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.