Toll Free: 800-511-9293
Local: 706-860-5769

ACCA issues important decision on preserving objections at trial

The Army Court of Criminal Appeals recently affirmed a soldier’s court-martial conviction because their counsel failed to properly observe an issue at trial.  In United States v. Shaw the ACCA held that when a lawyer makes a particular objection at trial, the accused cannot later object on different grounds. In this case, the appellant wanted to admit evidence of an alleged rape victim’s prior consenting to sex with the accused after initially saying no. The ACCA said that the appellant’s trial defense lawyer did not seek to admit this evidence at trial, and did not properly preserve the issue for appeal.  This case once again points out the need to properly preserve issues at trial.  If you need a court-martial lawyer or court-martial appeal lawyer contact Mr. Cassara immediately.

United States v. Shaw

Related posts

Recent Argument

I had the honor of arguing the case of United States v. Eppes at...

Valor Radio

While in NY recently, I had the privilege of appearing on the radio show...

PTSD and TBI

I see more and more cases with service members who have either PTSD and/or...

Why I do what I do

As a defense attorney, I am frequently asked how I can represent people I...

Shaken Baby Syndrome

This is an interesting article on “Shaken Baby Syndrome.”  I have represented numerous service...

Varieties of Courts-Martial

Summary Court-Martial – Trial by summary court-martial provides a simplified process for the resolution...

Court-Martial Appeals

Following a conviction at court-martial, a service member has several rights with regards the...

Judicial Review and You

Known as “Judicial Review,” federal courts are empowered with the authority to review decisions...

Happy Veterans Day 2011

Today, Friday, November 11, 2011, our nation comes together to celebrate and thank veterans...

Comments are currently closed.