On 21 June 2013, in United States v. Eller, the Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals denied a government appeal of a military judge’s decision to grant a challenge for cause based on a court-martial panel member’s knowledge of President Obama’s influential comments about sexual assault as well as her opinion about whether verbal consent was required for a sexual interaction to be consensual. The appellate court did not make a ruling that President Obama’s words amounted to unlawful command influence. Further, because of the other issue backing the challenge for cause in this case, this case does not stand for the proposition that a challenge for cause based on President Obama’s words alone would stand. However, there is no doubt that these challenges will continue during the voir dire process in sexual assault cases. The decisions that are made regarding the President’s words in sexual assault cases may have a huge impact in your case if you are currently facing sexual assault charges in a court-martial, a nonjudicial punishment hearing or adverse administrative action. If you are facing sexual allegations in this environment, you need an experienced and informed advocate on your side. To speak to an experienced court-martial and military defense attorney, call Bill Cassara at 706-860-5769 for a free consultation.
Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals Finds That Government Did Not Prove Sexual Assault Offenses Beyond a Reasonable Doubt
June 25, 2020
Army Court of Criminal Appeals Affirms Trial Judge’s Decision Excluding Hearsay Statements Made By Alleged Victim and Son
June 15, 2020
Great result for Army CW3 who received a GOMOR
June 5, 2020
Please enter your name.
Please enter a valid email address.
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.
Something went wrong. Please check your entries and try again.