Last week, the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Louisiana v. Ramos. Louisiana is one of two states (the other being Oregon) that do not require unanimous verdicts in criminal jury trials. In 2016, Evangelisto Ramos was found guilty of second degree murder by a jury that voted 10-2 to convict. On appeal, … Read more

Navy Criminal Appeals

In December 2017, the Navy court-martialed retired Chief Petty Officer Stephen Begani for attempted sexual assault of a child and attempted sexual abuse of a child. The charges stemmed from online conversations between the retired Chief and an undercover NCIS agent who was portraying a 15-year old child and the Chief’s travel to meet with … Read more

Audio of Wednesday’s oral arguments at CAAF is available at the following links: United States v. Finch, No. 19-0298/AR (CAAFlog case page): Oral argument audio (wma)(mp3) The audio is also available on our oral argument audio podcast.

Court of Appeals

Recently received a favorable decision from the Court of Federal Claims remanding our case back to the AFBCMR for corrective action.  Our client had an undiagnosed seizure disorder that led him to act as if he were drunk and disorderly at an event.  Even with the recommendations for relief by three medical advisory opinions, the … Read more

Court of Appeals

In February of this year, the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces (CAAF) issued its opinion in United States v. Briggs. It was the second CAAF decision addressing the statute of limitations in sexual assault cases issued in the last two years. This blog discussed both cases here. Essentially, the Court found that the … Read more

court of appeals

The Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals recently issued a decision in the case of United States v. Begani that held that military retirees are not subject to court-martial jurisdiction. Chief Petty Officer Begani retired from the Navy in June of 2017 after 24 years of active duty service and was transferred to the Fleet … Read more

air force drug conviction

On June 7th, the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces issued an opinion in United States v. Gonzales. This opinion reinforces how important it is for defense counsel to get objections and concerns on the record during trial. Specialist Gonzales was charged with, among other offenses, rape of a child, which requires penetration, however … Read more