article 32

by

An Army officer contacted Mr. Cassara after being accused of larceny of $58,000 in BAH funds. Charges were preferred against the officer and an Article 32 (b) hearing was scheduled. The client needed a court martial attorney and contacted Mr. Cassara. Mr. Cassara was able to negotiate a disposition at Article 15, meaning the officer … Read more

by

An Army officer was suspected of conspiring with another officer to defraud the government of BAH funds. He knew he needed an experienced court martial attorney. After retaining Mr. Cassara, and after Mr. Cassara investigated the matter, no charges were brought against the officer. The matter is now closed and the officer will continue with … Read more